---
title: "Patch Attention Wisely: Understanding Patch Length in Attention-Based Forecasting"
source: "arXiv AI/CL/LG（论文）"
source_tier: "t2"
url: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08160v1"
permalink: "https://feed.astralor.com/items/itm_59c3f35bde41abf47728559b"
published: "2026-11-05T15:18:11.000Z"
score: 57
channel: "tech"
tags: ["Patch Attention Wisely","Understanding Patch Length","Attention-Based Forecasting Attention-based","Patch","Attention-based","For"]
---

# Patch Attention Wisely: Understanding Patch Length in Attention-Based Forecasting

## 速览

Attention-based time series forecasters commonly group consecutive observations into patches. Patch length is known to have a substantial impact on forecasting performance, yet its selection remains largely empirical. W…

## 关键点

- Attention-based time series forecasters commonly group consecutive observations into patches.
- Patch length is known to have a substantial impact on forecasting performance, yet its selection remains largely empirical.
- We develop a theoretical framework that explains why patch length matters for forecasting accuracy and provides a principled basis for its selection.

## 全文

Attention-based time series forecasters commonly group consecutive observations into patches. Patch length is known to have a substantial impact on forecasting performance, yet its selection remains largely empirical. We develop a theoretical framework that explains why patch length matters for forecasting accuracy and provides a principled basis for its selection. For linear state-space models, we derive an exact factorization of the forecasting coefficient matrix that separates forecast dynamics from filtering dynamics. We show that dominance of a single forecast component at long horizons does not generally imply a rank-one representation. This explains why longer horizons alone need not reduce representational complexity. We combine the factorization with estimation bounds to develop a patch-selection criterion that balances representation and estimation errors under temporal dependence. Our analysis establishes conditions under which balanced patching is justified and clarifies how predictive structure, head count, training sample size, and long-run dependence enter the selection criterion.

---

引用前请核对原文;本文由星际流动整理:https://feed.astralor.com/items/itm_59c3f35bde41abf47728559b