---
title: "AI Mania Is Eviscerating Global Decision-Making"
source: "Simon Willison 博客（Atom）"
source_tier: "t2"
url: "https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jul/19/ai-mania/#atom-everything"
permalink: "https://feed.astralor.com/items/itm_5f3d53932c9822f06d1f5d85"
published: "2026-07-19T05:06:21.000Z"
score: 69
channel: "ai"
tags: ["AI Ethics","AI Mania","Corporate Decision-Making","Tech Hype"]
---

# AI Mania Is Eviscerating Global Decision-Making

## AI commentary

> This article uses anonymous leaks to reveal the absurd reality behind AI mania, serving as a wake-up call for investors and executives. It reminds us that when everyone chants 'AI revolution,' truly rational voices may be drowned out. A must-read for anyone involved in AI decision-making.

## At a glance

Nik Suresh shares spicy insider anecdotes revealing executives who never used ChatGPT yet crafted AI-centered strategies, engineers rewriting code with AI just to keep their jobs, and salespeople inflating productivity gains to avoid contract cancellations. The article exposes how AI mania distorts corporate decision-making, leading to absurdity and inefficiency.

## Key points

- An executive who never used ChatGPT or any AI tool produced an AI-centered technical strategy for a $2B+ revenue company.
- An engineer had AI rewrite their Go repository in Zig just to keep their job, while working on something else.
- Salespeople exaggerate 100x productivity gains; dissent is seen as an attack on customer executives, risking contract cancellation.

## Full text

AI Mania Is Eviscerating Global Decision-Making Here's an entertaining perspective from Nik Suresh on the AI mania that is overwhelming the large companies that he consults with. It's crammed with spicy anecdotes from anonymous sources. In one extreme case, I have seen an executive confess that they had never even used ChatGPT or any AI tool in their life, immediately after producing a technical strategy for an organisation with $2B+ in revenue which was entirely centered around AI. Here's a report from an engineer at a company with a token leaderboard: Checking out a parallel copy of our Go repository and telling the AI to rewrite the whole thing in Zig while I work on something else just so I can keep my job. I particularly enjoyed this report of a conversation with a skeptical executive at an over-enthusiastic company: I asked why this was being repeated without opposition. Was it just sales fluff? The answer was a lot more interesting. It was partially ridiculous sales material being delivered to an easily excitable audience, but this was not the dominant factor constraining honesty. Executives at their customers were saying absurd things about achieving 100x productivity, and this meant that if any executive at the vendor said that these gains were not plausible, it would undermine the credibility of the customer’s executive, be perceived as an attack (or heresy), and possibly result in an enterprise contract cancellation. And getting enterprise contracts cancelled because you wanted to opine on something that doesn’t really matter to your organisation’s mission is a great way to get fired. Via Hacker News Tags: ai, ai-ethics, ai-misuse

---

Verify against the original before citing; curated by Astral Feed: https://feed.astralor.com/items/itm_5f3d53932c9822f06d1f5d85