---
title: "$τ$-Rec-Books: A Disclosure-Controlled Benchmark for Requirement Elicitation in Agentic Recommender Systems"
source: "arXiv AI/CL/LG（论文）"
source_tier: "t2"
url: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04459v1"
permalink: "https://feed.astralor.com/items/itm_7b2dec1a8f5bf9df75f4b8aa"
published: "2026-11-03T07:47:46.000Z"
score: 60
channel: "tech"
tags: ["LLM","AI Agent","RAG","Rec-Books","Disclosure-Controlled Benchmark","Requirement Elicitation","Agentic Recommender Systems","While"]
---

# $τ$-Rec-Books: A Disclosure-Controlled Benchmark for Requirement Elicitation in Agentic Recommender Systems

## At a glance

While conversational recommendation systems provide a more natural user interface, they face the challenge of progressively discovering a user's needs before they can recommend an item that satisfies them. To evaluate t…

## Key points

- While conversational recommendation systems provide a more natural user interface, they face the challenge of progressively discovering a user's needs before they can recommend an item that satisfies them.
- To evaluate the ability of AI agents at this elicitation process, we introduce $τ$-Rec-Books, a benchmark that holds each user request fixed while varying only when the user reveals their requirements: all at the start …
- A hidden requirement can be found only by proposing books and inferring it from the user's accept or reject verdicts.

## Full text

While conversational recommendation systems provide a more natural user interface, they face the challenge of progressively discovering a user's needs before they can recommend an item that satisfies them. To evaluate the ability of AI agents at this elicitation process, we introduce $τ$-Rec-Books, a benchmark that holds each user request fixed while varying only when the user reveals their requirements: all at the start (volunteer), one at the start and the rest when asked (mixed), or some never (hidden). A hidden requirement can be found only by proposing books and inferring it from the user's accept or reject verdicts. We generate 450 tasks over a catalog of 20,000 books from Wikidata, develop a rule-based simulated user to answer the agent, and score recommendations against catalog metadata without an LLM judge. Across four agents and two search interfaces, success rates fall for every agent and interface, on average from 0.975 (volunteer) to 0.756 (mixed) and 0.283 (hidden). Mixed tasks fail mainly because agents do not ask, and when told to ask, every agent reaches at least 0.931. On hidden tasks, most failures come from agents recommending a book they never proposed to the user. When told to propose first, agents only match a simple baseline that proposes popular books, and stay well below one that uses rejection to rule out possible requirements. We release the catalog pipeline, task generator, simulated user, validators, reference agents, and all agent traces at https://github.com/nbharaths/tau-rec/tree/main/data/tracks/books-wikidata-v2.

---

Verify against the original before citing; curated by Astral Feed: https://feed.astralor.com/items/itm_7b2dec1a8f5bf9df75f4b8aa