---
title: "Towards Foundation Decision Models: Drex"
source: "arXiv AI/CL/LG（论文）"
source_tier: "t2"
url: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07854v1"
permalink: "https://feed.astralor.com/items/itm_a332cc5e4d2383ae1bf24eff"
published: "2026-11-05T11:31:13.000Z"
score: 60
channel: "tech"
tags: ["LLM","AI Agent","OpenAI","Anthropic","开源","推理效率","多模态","Towards Foundation Decision"]
---

# Towards Foundation Decision Models: Drex

## At a glance

Autoregressive approaches with large language models, such as long chain-of-thought reasoning, have become the default for new AI applications because they reach higher accuracy on a wide range of tasks. In production, …

## Key points

- Autoregressive approaches with large language models, such as long chain-of-thought reasoning, have become the default for new AI applications because they reach higher accuracy on a wide range of tasks.
- In production, however, they give inconsistent answers, require parsing of outputs, and add cost and latency.
- Decision models address this: given a question and a set of options supplied by the user, they return a probability distribution over the options without autoregressive decoding.

## Full text

Autoregressive approaches with large language models, such as long chain-of-thought reasoning, have become the default for new AI applications because they reach higher accuracy on a wide range of tasks. In production, however, they give inconsistent answers, require parsing of outputs, and add cost and latency. Decision models address this: given a question and a set of options supplied by the user, they return a probability distribution over the options without autoregressive decoding. We present Drex, a family of four open decision models with 8B (DLM), 9B (v1.5), 35B with 3B active (v2.0), and 27B (Max) parameters. Each request consists of a state (a document, record, or agent context, optionally with images) and questions about it, each asking for a choice among options, a yes/no judgment, or a score on an ordered scale. Training combines supervised fine-tuning with reinforcement learning from adjusted feedback (RLAF), plus vision tuning for Max. Ablations show that RLAF improves accuracy and that consistency losses improve robustness to option order. On Decision Index 0.4.1, Max sets a new state of the art among the decision models we compare (67.52 on the public suite vs. 60.70 for Jev 1.14.0). On Decision Bench v4, it is statistically tied with d3-turbo and GPT-6 Sol and trails Claude Opus 5.5 by 1.6 points, and it has the highest accuracy among decision models on DecideBench. Max answers a typical request in 183 ms, against about 2.0 s for GPT-6 Sol and 3.5 s for Claude Opus 5.5, and its outputs are stable under option reordering. All four models are open source: https://github.com/nace-ai/drex-decision-models

---

Verify against the original before citing; curated by Astral Feed: https://feed.astralor.com/items/itm_a332cc5e4d2383ae1bf24eff