Anthropic's Best AI Model Struggles to Attract Users as Cheaper Tools Thrive
Score
72提供了罕见的按模型支出的市场份额数据，补充了公开收入数字背后的真实采用情况。
引用 FT 与 Ramp 数据源，条理清晰，对模型表现和商业指标进行了有效交叉验证。
对评估 AI 模型采购策略和企业市场趋势有直接参考价值。
基于 2026 年 7 月最新运营数据，且涉及刚发布的 Opus 5 和 GPT 5.6。
来源为 FT 和 Simon Willison 博客，并引用了 Ramp 的信用卡账单数据，可信度较高。
Base 80 × T2 Source weight ×0.9 = 72
Curation line 70Selected
Why selected
Provides rare spend-side model adoption data, directly revealing the real market performance of flagship versus cost-effective models.
AI commentary
「What makes this piece worth reading is how it juxtaposes revenue with actual model spend, debunking the illusion that the best model is the most popular. For anyone tracking AI commercialization or doing model selection, this data is far more convincing than any product launch.」
Quick overview
According to a Financial Times story citing people with knowledge of the matter, Anthropic's annualized revenue for July reached $65 billion, up from $47 billion in May, and the company expects Q3 to be profitable using the same model that declared Q2 profitable. However, Ramp's AI index, which tracks model adoption via billing data from 70,000 companies, shows that in July 2026 Anthropic model spend was led by Opus 4.8 at 28.0%, while the newly released flagship Opus 5 only captured 3.5%, and Fable 5, which costs more, accounted for 8.0%. OpenAI's annualized revenue has jumped 35% in the quarter to date to over $40 billion, boosted by the July launch of GPT 5.6 after a sluggish start to the year. The data suggests the best model is not necessarily the most adopted; cost and practicality remain critical for enterprises.
- Anthropic's annualized revenue reached $65 billion in July, up from $47 billion in May, with Q3 profitability expected.
- Anthropic told investors it has 6,000 customers spending $100,000 or more annually.
- Ramp's AI index shows Opus 5 captured only 3.5% of Anthropic model spend in its first week, versus 28% for Opus 4.8.
- OpenAI's annualized revenue is over $40 billion, with GPT 5.6 driving a strong quarterly rebound.
Full text
Showing the source text; the full translation is being generated.
Anthropic’s best AI model struggles to attract users as cheaper tools thrive
A few interesting numbers in this FT story gathered from "people with knowledge of the matter":- Anthropic's "annualized revenue" for July is up to $65bn - it was $47bn in May, and I collected more historic numbers here.
- Anthropic expect Q3 to be profitable according to the same model they used to declare Q2 profitable. "It also told investors that it had 6,000 customers that spend $100,000 annually or more."
- As for OpenAI, "annualised revenue has jumped 35 per cent in the quarter to date and is now over $40bn, with the launch of GPT 5.6 in July jolting the company’s performance after a sluggish start to the year".
This article also introduced me to the Ramp AI index, which uses billing data from 70,000 Ramp credit card using companies to estimate model adoption.
Here's Ramp's breakdown of Anthropic model spend for July 2026, which looks reasonable given that Opus 5 was only released on July 24th, and supports the idea that Fable's cost has made it a less popular model:
- Opus 4.8: 28.0%
- Sonnet 4.6: 8.3%
- Fable 5: 8.0%
- Opus 4.6: 6.9%
- Sonnet 5: 3.6%
- Opus 5: 3.5%
- Opus 4.7: 1.7%
- Sonnet 4.5: 1.3%
- Haiku 4.5: 1.0%
- Opus 4.5: 0.7%
Via Hacker News
Tags: ai, openai, generative-ai, llms, anthropic, claude, claude-mythos-fable
Related items
89
FeaturedOpenAI Research: AI Is Redefining Job Boundaries
OpenAI研究：AI正在重新定义工作边界
If you care about the real impact of AI on work, this research is a must-read. Instead of theory, it uses data to show how ChatGPT users expand their task scope, offering direct insights for HR, managers, and every professional looking to upgrade their skills.
87
FeaturedOpenAI CFO Shares Five Lessons for Building an AI-Native Finance Function
OpenAI CFO 分享构建 AI 原生财务职能的五大经验
As an editor, I find this article uniquely valuable because it comes from a finance chief at an AI leader, not an external consultancy, making it highly practical. I recommend it to finance digitalization leads, CFOs, and anyone interested in AI-driven transformation.
87
FeaturedScientific Computing in the Age of Agentic AI: OpenAI Releases New Field Report
智能体AI时代下的科学计算：OpenAI发布新领域报告
This report is one of the most practical analyses in the current AI agent wave, especially suitable for practitioners in computational biology and drug discovery. It answers the key question 'What can AI agents do besides writing code?' and directly demonstrates productivity gains in complex scientific computing.
87
FeaturedReal World VoiceEQ: Measuring the Human Quality of Voice AI
Real World VoiceEQ：量化语音AI的人类自然度
What's noteworthy is that this benchmark truly focuses on the soft metric of 'human-likeness', not traditional speech recognition rate or MOS scores. For teams working on speech synthesis, voice cloning, or voice interaction, this is a highly practical reference tool that quickly identifies model deficiencies in emotion, prosody, etc. However, language support is currently limited; looking forward to future expansion.
85
FeaturedOpenAI Introduces AI Age Scorecard: A New Way to Measure ROI
OpenAI 推出AI时代记分卡：衡量投资回报的新方法
This blog post hits a sore point in the current AI industry: how to quantify input-output. For enterprise decision-makers deploying or planning large-scale AI, it helps avoid herd mentality. My personal advice: try defining 'useful work' based on your own business scenario, and avoid designing metrics that are merely formality.
85
FeaturedHow to Manage AI Investments in the Agentic Era: Focus on Useful Work per Dollar and High-Value Workflows
代理时代如何管理AI投资：聚焦每美元有用功与高价值工作流
This article is especially important for enterprises scaling AI agents. It reminds us that focusing solely on falling API prices is a trap; what really matters is the return per unit of work. I recommend CTOs and CFOs read it together and establish quantitative evaluation mechanisms internally.
85
FeaturedDesigning Organisations That Can Keep Up With AI: Organisational Latency as the Biggest Barrier
设计能跟上AI的组织：组织延迟成为最大障碍
What makes this article truly worth following is that it raises a neglected bottleneck: no matter how strong the technology is, if the organisation can't keep up, it's useless. For CTOs, CIOs, and transformation leaders, this is a more important framework than tech selection.
84
FeaturedRuff v0.16.0 Released: Default Rules Jump from 59 to 413, CI Pipelines Need Attention
Ruff v0.16.0 发布：默认规则从59条激增至413条，CI工作流需关注
For Python developers, this is an unmissable update signal. The significant increase in Ruff's default rules means we can no longer ignore potential issues in our code, and AI fix tools can lower the upgrade cost. Notably, Astral (OpenAI) is deeply integrating AI coding capabilities with static analysis tools, which may become the norm in future engineering practices.