有限量子记忆下的最优稳定子态测试与学习
评分
59精选理由
论文解决了量子信息论中一个核心开放问题,阐明了记忆约束下测试与学习的本质差异,技术新颖且结论深刻,具有重要理论价值。
AI 点评
「该工作揭示了在量子计算中,记忆资源对量子态区分类任务的根本影响,为设计资源高效的量子验证方案提供了理论指导。」
速览
该论文研究了在有限相干量子记忆下对n量子比特稳定子态进行测试与学习的问题。作者发现,当记忆受限时,稳定子态测试与学习之间的样本复杂度分离消失。具体地,在k量子比特记忆框架下,测试的样本复杂度为Θ(n-k),而非适应性学习的样本复杂度为Θ(n²/k)。此外,论文还证明即使在整个协议中保持记忆相干,纯度测试的样本复杂度也有指数级下界。主要结论揭示了相干量子记忆是导致稳定子态测试与学习分离的关键资源。
- 测试稳定子态所需样本数与可用量子记忆大小k线性相关:Θ(n-k)。
- 非适应性学习稳定子态的样本复杂度为Θ(n²/k),远高于测试。
- 纯度测试即使在全记忆相干条件下也需要指数级样本数。
- 相干量子记忆是稳定子态测试与学习性能分离的根本资源。
正文
Quantum Physics
arXiv:2607.02444v1 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 2 Jul 2026]Title:Optimal Stabilizer Testing and Learning with Limited Quantum Memory
Authors:Srinivasan Arunachalam, Louis Schatzki View a PDF of the paper titled Optimal Stabilizer Testing and Learning with Limited Quantum Memory, by Srinivasan Arunachalam and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:We study stabilizer state testing and learning with limited coherent quantum memory. Here an algorithm sequentially receives copies of an unknown $n$-qubit state, but may keep only $k$ qubits of coherent quantum memory between measurements. With unrestricted memory, seminal work of Gross, Nezami and Walter showed how to test $n$-qubit stabilizer states using $6$ copies, which is dimension independent, unlike the learning complexity of $\Theta(n)$. We show that this testing-vs-learning separation is lost under memory constraints. More concretely we show that
(1) The sample complexity of testing stabilizer states in the $k$-qubit memory framework is $\Theta(n-k)$. Our upper bound goes via a novel connection to the hidden shift problem and the lower bound is proven using a novel approach to average case bounds on likelihood ratios via combinatorics of the stochastic orthogonal group.
(2) The sample complexity of learning stabilizer states with $k$ qubits of memory, in the non-adaptive framework, is $\Theta(n^2/k)$.
As a further application of our techniques, we prove an exponential lower bound for purity testing even when the memory may be left coherent throughout the protocol. Our main results identify coherent quantum memory as the resource enabling the usual separation between stabilizer testing and learning. In particular, even with $k=0.99n$ qubits of memory, there is no constant-copy stabilizer tester; furthermore for $k=cn$ qubits of memory (for $0< c < 1$), stabilizer testing is as hard as learning, with both requiring $\Theta(n)$ copies.
| Comments: | 66 pages, 5 figures |
| Subjects: | Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Information Theory (cs.IT); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.02444 [quant-ph] |
| (or arXiv:2607.02444v1 [quant-ph] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.02444 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Louis Schatzki [view email][v1] Thu, 2 Jul 2026 17:11:38 UTC (2,148 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
-
View a PDF of the paper titled Optimal Stabilizer Testing and Learning with Limited Quantum Memory, by Srinivasan Arunachalam and 1 other authors
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
quant-ph < prev | next >new | recent | 2026-07 Change to browse by: cs
cs.CC
cs.DS
cs.IT
cs.LG
math
math.IT
References & Citations
export BibTeX citation Loading...BibTeX formatted citation
× Data provided by:Bookmark
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, MediaCode, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) DemosDemos
Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related PapersRecommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) About arXivLabsarXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)相关条目
92
精选OpenRouter 推出提示缓存与粘性路由,大幅降低多轮对话成本
对于高频调用 AI API 的开发者,这个功能堪称直接省钱利器。粘性路由保证了缓存命中率,配合 session_id 零配置接入,值得所有使用 OpenRouter 的团队立即尝试。
91
精选ChatGPT Work:可在跨应用和文件中执行操作的AI Agent
我认为这是AI助手从问答走向执行的关键一步。对需要自动化复杂工作流的专业人士尤其值得关注。ChatGPT Work可能成为生产力工具的新范式。
90
精选前沿实验室代理入侵事件技术时间线:2026年7月事件剖析
这篇技术时间线值得所有AI安全研究员和代理开发者细读——它不只是描述一次攻击,而是为整个行业敲响了代理系统防御体系薄弱的警钟。对正在部署自主代理的团队来说,这是必读的灾难预防手册。
90
精选更好的工具反而让Copilot代码审查更糟?GitHub这样改进
这篇博客值得所有AI产品工程师和ML从业者仔细阅读——它打破了'更强大的工具=更好的AI'的直觉,转而强调与Agent推理模式匹配的工程哲学。对正在优化代码审查或类似Agent产品的团队尤其重要。
88
精选OpenRouter 推出统一多模态 API:单端点支持图像、视频、音频、嵌入与转录
这条消息值得所有做多模态AI应用的开发者关注:OpenRouter用联合API解决了模型切换的痛点,特别适合初创团队或快速原型开发。如果你正被多个API密钥和SDK折磨,这个接口可能是你需要的统一层。
87
精选Anthropic 推出 Claude for Teachers:面向教师的教育 AI 工具
这条消息对教育工作者和AI行业观察者都很有价值。Anthropic没有选择通用聊天机器人,而是专门为教师设计了安全可控的工具,这显示出AI在垂直场景落地的正确思路——不是技术炫技,而是切实解决用户痛点。同时,产品内置的安全护栏也值得其他AI公司参考,尤其是在面向儿童或青少年的场景中。
86
精选OpenRouter发布全新Auto Router:用市场智慧优化模型路由
这条更新值得所有用API开发AI应用的人关注。以前选模型靠经验和测试,现在市场数据帮你选。虽然细节不多,但方向很对。对依赖聚合模型服务的团队尤其重要。
86
精选Claude Code v2.1.211 发布:多项修复与改进
作为一个经常使用 Claude Code 进行自动化编码的开发者,我特别关注这次的安全修复,尤其是权限预览字符绕过和自动模式覆盖钩子决策的问题——这些直接关系到团队协作时的安全边界。后台代理报告的改进也让长时间运行的任务更可靠。建议所有使用者尽快升级。