随机洗牌算法在凸优化中彻底击败随机梯度下降,理论误区终被破解
评分
57精选理由
突破性理论贡献:解决了光滑凸优化中RR vs SGD的经典开放问题,直接改变了算法比较的基础认知,具有高引用潜力和实践指导意义。
AI 点评
「该结果彻底纠正了优化理论界对随机洗牌算法的长期误判,为深度学习、大规模机器学习中广泛使用的RR策略提供了理论基石,可能影响未来优化器设计与训练协议。」
速览
一篇来自arXiv的论文首次证明:在光滑凸优化中,使用随机洗牌的随机梯度下降算法(Shuffling SGD)在任意合理步长和任意有限轮次后,性能均严格优于传统随机梯度下降(SGD)。此前理论认为RR只能在极小的步长下收敛,且收敛速率在轮次较少时弱于SGD,严重偏离实际。本研究彻底消除了这一矛盾,为RR的广泛成功提供了坚实理论依据。
- 传统SGD理论假设数据随机采样,实际中常用随机洗牌(RR)顺序遍历,但RR长期缺乏理论证明。
- 此前理论要求步长≤1/n才能保证RR收敛,且当训练轮数<n时,RR的收敛率反而比SGD差。
- 本研究突破了这些限制,证明RR在任意合理步长和任意轮数下均优于SGD,且收敛速度更快。
正文
Mathematics > Optimization and Control
arXiv:2606.32005v1 (math) [Submitted on 30 Jun 2026]Title:Random Reshuffling Dominates Stochastic Gradient Descent
Authors:Zijian Liu View a PDF of the paper titled Random Reshuffling Dominates Stochastic Gradient Descent, by Zijian Liu View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Stochastic Gradient Descent ($\textsf{SGD}$) is one of the most classical optimization algorithms with favorable theoretical guarantees, yet the practical implementation of $\textsf{SGD}$ differs subtly from its well-known form and is often referred to as Shuffling Stochastic Gradient Descent ($\textsf{Shuffling SGD}$). A particularly popular strategy in $\textsf{Shuffling SGD}$ is Random Reshuffling ($\textsf{RR}$), which has achieved great empirical success across numerous experiments. Despite its strong performance, $\textsf{RR}$ has long been considered a heuristic due to a lack of theoretical support. Over the last decade, people have finally established provable convergence rates for $\textsf{RR}$, thus justifying its observed superiority. However, for smooth convex optimization, two clouds over the convergence theory of $\textsf{RR}$ remain to this day. More precisely, according to the current theory, $\textsf{Shuffling SGD}$ under $\textsf{RR}$ converges only when the stepsize is smaller than a threshold proportional to $1/n$, where $n$ is the number of summands in the objective (or the number of data points). Consequently, the optimally tuned theoretical rate of $\textsf{Shuffling SGD}$ under $\textsf{RR}$ is strictly worse than that of $\textsf{SGD}$ when the number of epochs is smaller than another threshold proportional to $n$. These two restrictions heavily limit the applicability of existing theories and leave a critical mismatch with practice. In this work, for the first time, we prove that $\textsf{RR}$ dominates $\textsf{SGD}$ in smooth convex optimization under any reasonable stepsize after any finite number of epochs, thereby addressing a longstanding open question.
| Comments: | COLT 2026 |
| Subjects: | Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.32005 [math.OC] |
| (or arXiv:2606.32005v1 [math.OC] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.32005 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Zijian Liu [view email][v1] Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:38:22 UTC (37 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
-
View a PDF of the paper titled Random Reshuffling Dominates Stochastic Gradient Descent, by Zijian Liu
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
math.OC < prev | next >new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs
cs.LG
math
stat
stat.ML
References & Citations
export BibTeX citation Loading...BibTeX formatted citation
× Data provided by:Bookmark
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, MediaCode, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) DemosDemos
Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related PapersRecommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) About arXivLabsarXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)相关条目
92
精选OpenRouter 推出提示缓存与粘性路由,大幅降低多轮对话成本
对于高频调用 AI API 的开发者,这个功能堪称直接省钱利器。粘性路由保证了缓存命中率,配合 session_id 零配置接入,值得所有使用 OpenRouter 的团队立即尝试。
91
精选ChatGPT Work:可在跨应用和文件中执行操作的AI Agent
我认为这是AI助手从问答走向执行的关键一步。对需要自动化复杂工作流的专业人士尤其值得关注。ChatGPT Work可能成为生产力工具的新范式。
90
精选前沿实验室代理入侵事件技术时间线:2026年7月事件剖析
这篇技术时间线值得所有AI安全研究员和代理开发者细读——它不只是描述一次攻击,而是为整个行业敲响了代理系统防御体系薄弱的警钟。对正在部署自主代理的团队来说,这是必读的灾难预防手册。
90
精选更好的工具反而让Copilot代码审查更糟?GitHub这样改进
这篇博客值得所有AI产品工程师和ML从业者仔细阅读——它打破了'更强大的工具=更好的AI'的直觉,转而强调与Agent推理模式匹配的工程哲学。对正在优化代码审查或类似Agent产品的团队尤其重要。
88
精选OpenRouter 推出统一多模态 API:单端点支持图像、视频、音频、嵌入与转录
这条消息值得所有做多模态AI应用的开发者关注:OpenRouter用联合API解决了模型切换的痛点,特别适合初创团队或快速原型开发。如果你正被多个API密钥和SDK折磨,这个接口可能是你需要的统一层。
87
精选Anthropic 推出 Claude for Teachers:面向教师的教育 AI 工具
这条消息对教育工作者和AI行业观察者都很有价值。Anthropic没有选择通用聊天机器人,而是专门为教师设计了安全可控的工具,这显示出AI在垂直场景落地的正确思路——不是技术炫技,而是切实解决用户痛点。同时,产品内置的安全护栏也值得其他AI公司参考,尤其是在面向儿童或青少年的场景中。
86
精选OpenRouter发布全新Auto Router:用市场智慧优化模型路由
这条更新值得所有用API开发AI应用的人关注。以前选模型靠经验和测试,现在市场数据帮你选。虽然细节不多,但方向很对。对依赖聚合模型服务的团队尤其重要。
86
精选Claude Code v2.1.211 发布:多项修复与改进
作为一个经常使用 Claude Code 进行自动化编码的开发者,我特别关注这次的安全修复,尤其是权限预览字符绕过和自动模式覆盖钩子决策的问题——这些直接关系到团队协作时的安全边界。后台代理报告的改进也让长时间运行的任务更可靠。建议所有使用者尽快升级。