Right in the Right Way: LM Training with Verifiable Rewards and Human Demonstrations
Score
59Why selected
Novel method with comprehensive experiments, significantly improving non-verifiable properties and solving reward hacking, though generalization to larger models is not yet verified.
AI commentary
「This work bridges the gap between RL and SFT, offering a scalable path toward jointly optimizing verifiable and non-verifiable properties of a task.」
Quick overview
This paper proposes an adversarial generator-discriminator framework that augments verifiable rewards with a learned signal from human demonstrations. The generator is trained via RL to maximize both task accuracy and an adversarial reward from the discriminator, which learns to distinguish human-written outputs from model-generated ones. Across bug fixing, story generation, and a reward hacking benchmark, the method consistently improves non-verifiable properties while preserving RLVR accuracy gains and nearly eliminating reward hacking.
- Proposes an adversarial framework combining verifiable rewards with human demonstrations to address RLVR's neglect of subjective attributes.
- Generator optimizes task accuracy and adversarial reward; discriminator serves as proxy for human distribution, providing unformalized feedback.
- Reduces edit distance in bug fixing, improves win rate and diversity in story generation, and nearly eliminates reward hacking.
Full text
Computer Science > Machine Learning
arXiv:2607.01181v1 (cs) [Submitted on 1 Jul 2026]Title:Right in the Right Way: LM Training with Verifiable Rewards and Human Demonstrations
Authors:Mehul Damani, Isha Puri, Idan Shenfeld, Jacob Andreas View a PDF of the paper titled Right in the Right Way: LM Training with Verifiable Rewards and Human Demonstrations, by Mehul Damani and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:RL with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for training LMs on tasks with well-defined success metrics, such as code generation and mathematical reasoning. However, current RLVR methods optimize only what can be objectively scored, often neglecting subjective, non-verifiable aspects of human-like outputs, such as style and structure. This limitation leads to well-documented failure modes such as diversity collapse, unnatural-sounding responses, and reward hacking. We propose an adversarial generator-discriminator framework that augments verifiable rewards with a learned signal from human demonstrations. A generator model is trained using RL to maximize both task accuracy and an adversarial reward derived from a discriminator. The discriminator, trained alongside the generator policy, learns to distinguish human-written outputs from model-generated ones. The discriminator serves as a learned proxy for the human output distribution, providing feedback on aspects of generation that are difficult to formalize as scalar rewards. Across diverse domains, including bug fixing and open-ended generation, our approach consistently improves non-verifiable properties while preserving the accuracy gains of RLVR. In bug fixing, our method produces solutions with significantly lower edit distance compared to RLVR baselines while matching end performance. In story generation, our method significantly improves win rate while producing stories that are diverse and more human-like. And in a simple reward hacking benchmark, our method nearly eliminates model misbehavior while maintaining high benchmark scores. Together, these results show that our approach bridges RL and SFT, offering a scalable path toward jointly optimizing the verifiable and non-verifiable properties of a task.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.01181 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2607.01181v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.01181 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Mehul Damani [view email][v1] Wed, 1 Jul 2026 17:13:35 UTC (1,028 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
-
View a PDF of the paper titled Right in the Right Way: LM Training with Verifiable Rewards and Human Demonstrations, by Mehul Damani and 3 other authors
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
cs.LG < prev | next >new | recent | 2026-07 Change to browse by: cs
cs.AI
cs.CL
References & Citations
export BibTeX citation Loading...BibTeX formatted citation
× Data provided by:Bookmark
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, MediaCode, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) DemosDemos
Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related PapersRecommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) About arXivLabsarXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)Related items
FeaturedDeepSeek V4 Doubles Token Share on OpenRouter, Driven by Agentic Workloads
DeepSeek V4 在 OpenRouter 上的代币份额翻倍,智能体工作负载成主要驱动力
The rapid adoption of DeepSeek V4 signals a strong market preference for high-performance, low-cost inference models, especially as agentic use cases reshape AI deployment.
91
FeaturedEnabling Two Settings Triples ARC-AGI-3 Benchmark Scores
启用两项设置使ARC-AGI-3基准测试分数提升三倍
This finding is crucial! It shows that model performance depends not only on training but also on inference-time configuration. For AI engineers and researchers, this is a must-know optimization direction. Teams deploying models on resource-constrained devices in particular could find a low-cost way to boost capabilities.
91
FeaturedGPT-5.6: Fusing Frontier Intelligence with Frontier Efficiency
GPT-5.6:前沿智能与前沿效率的融合
This news is worth watching as it marks a shift from pure parameter scaling to efficiency competition. For AI developers and business decision-makers, GPT-5.6 means higher performance at lower cost, especially for long-context or agentic tasks previously hindered by inference expenses. OpenAI's move may redefine what 'frontier' means.
91
FeaturedLFM2.5-Encoders: New Models for Fast Long-Context Inference on CPU
LFM2.5-Encoder:面向CPU快速长上下文推理的新模型
This blog post catches my eye because it directly solves the pain point of running long-context LLMs on CPU. For teams or individual developers without high-end GPUs, the LFM2.5-Encoder series offers a ready-to-use open-source solution. Highly recommended for those working on RAG, document search, or code analysis—now a standard server can handle million-token documents.
91
FeaturedGPT-Red: OpenAI Automates Red Teaming via Self-Play to Boost Model Robustness
GPT-Red:OpenAI通过自我对弈实现AI红队自动化,提升模型鲁棒性
GPT-Red marks a milestone from human to automated red-teaming—essential for safety engineers and alignment researchers. While reducing cost, it also raises ethical questions about automated attacks, worth pondering for everyone in AI governance.
91
FeaturedOpenAI Launches GPT-5.5 Bio Bug Bounty Program
OpenAI推出GPT-5.5生物漏洞赏金计划
This program deserves attention as it pioneers the extension of AI bug bounty to biosecurity, offering a new research direction for the security community and a practical training ground for AI risk governance. It is particularly important for model safety researchers, biosecurity experts, and practitioners concerned about dual-use AI risks.
91
FeaturedvLLM Introduces Native-Speed Transformers Modeling Backend for Enhanced Inference Performance
vLLM推出原生速度Transformers建模后端,大幅提升推理性能
This update is critical for AI engineering teams: eliminating format conversion speeds up model iteration, and 2-5x speedup directly reduces GPU costs. If you're building LLM online services or batch inference, this is practically a must-read technical update.
90
FeaturedGoogle DeepMind Introduces SL2T, a Sign Language-to-Text Model for Deaf Users
Google DeepMind 发布手语转文本模型 SL2T,助力聋人用户
This news matters not only as a technical breakthrough but also as a sign that AI is beginning to address the needs of marginalized groups. For developers, the architecture and technical approach of SL2T merit deep study; for accessibility advocates, it's a key case for advancing industry standards.